This is an excellent debate which took place in in Copenhagen, Denmark. It's a
textbook-example of what happens when a good revisionist debates a
holocaust believer and a good example why they always try to avoid a
public debate. The first minutes are a
little bit boring but after 17 minutes it gets really interesting. It's a
contant back and forth between Andersson and Faurisson. I found it very instructive how Faurisson responds to all of Anderssons claims and how he nails him down, and how Andersson tries to evade Faurissons precise questions. I sometimes wondered why so many other revisionists always called Faurisson
one of the most important revisionists and one of their most
influential mentors, since there are other revisionists who have
produced much more literature. But after listening to this debate
I know why. It's obvious how much he knows about the topic, he never
evades a question, and he has always a very convincing answer. It's
amazing how he corners his opponent with precise and strategic
questions, almost like a chess-player. And both Faurisson and Andersson are always fair during the whole debate. I encourage everyone to carefully listen to and study this debate. I think learned a lot from it how to debate a believer.

plus-circle Add Review

comment

Reviews